It's no news that the Constitutional Court plays a very important political role in a legal system, even more than the judicial function that holds (on request, not essence). This political role is linked to the portion of state power exercised by, for example, by acting negative legislator of unconstitutionality, and, in some way, to the way members are elected. It is an undeniable fact that there will be a strong politicization responsible for this choice (either the head of state or parliament), but that it should not be confused at all, to seek to obtain a benefit or to a particular group.
Unfortunately, this is not understood in our country, let alone in the game (unfortunately) of government. Indeed, on Friday, May 21 Rep. Mulder said the 36 votes available to the ruling party will not participate in any election for judges of the Constitutional Court, as neither of the two candidates seeking to be elected to the charges Gotelli and judges Landa Arroyo Vergara (talk about Carlos Ramos Nunez and Oscar Urviola) satisfy political interests. Besides, "said Mulder," await until the judge leaves office Mesía Ramirez later this year, so that the ruling Nominate your own candidate for the TC. That is his "political strategy."
What to say about this incredible honesty, almost abutting the nerve? Surely something quite familiar: the APRA rules for partners and best interest of the party, not caring little that the TC, today, is completely discredited and the public screaming for qualified judges. Is that too much to ask? For if this decision depends on the political class now entrenched officials ten or fifteen years ago in his seat, with the prestige on the floor but voters still-because truth itself is a tall order, perhaps too much.
So Mulder is not incumbent that the TC continue to issue statements poorly motivated, or ruling on such sensitive issues with a surprising ignorance and irresponsibility (the case of tariff on cement and are only two tests PUCP of it.) Is only concerned that the officer can choose a candidate who represents their political interests ( rectius: that favors them) but this time I will be faithful and loyal, not judges who were nominated, supported and elected and in return had to meet with your order supporter, but finished them unlimited power to seduce. This is the reason why there is not a "politicization" of the TC, which necessarily exists, but a despicable politiquerización. "
The truth is that this situation does nothing but prolong the mediocrity and corruption worse, makes you lose hope TC see a really competent and responsible.
Unfortunately, this is not understood in our country, let alone in the game (unfortunately) of government. Indeed, on Friday, May 21 Rep. Mulder said the 36 votes available to the ruling party will not participate in any election for judges of the Constitutional Court, as neither of the two candidates seeking to be elected to the charges Gotelli and judges Landa Arroyo Vergara (talk about Carlos Ramos Nunez and Oscar Urviola) satisfy political interests. Besides, "said Mulder," await until the judge leaves office Mesía Ramirez later this year, so that the ruling Nominate your own candidate for the TC. That is his "political strategy."
What to say about this incredible honesty, almost abutting the nerve? Surely something quite familiar: the APRA rules for partners and best interest of the party, not caring little that the TC, today, is completely discredited and the public screaming for qualified judges. Is that too much to ask? For if this decision depends on the political class now entrenched officials ten or fifteen years ago in his seat, with the prestige on the floor but voters still-because truth itself is a tall order, perhaps too much.
So Mulder is not incumbent that the TC continue to issue statements poorly motivated, or ruling on such sensitive issues with a surprising ignorance and irresponsibility (the case of tariff on cement and are only two tests PUCP of it.) Is only concerned that the officer can choose a candidate who represents their political interests ( rectius: that favors them) but this time I will be faithful and loyal, not judges who were nominated, supported and elected and in return had to meet with your order supporter, but finished them unlimited power to seduce. This is the reason why there is not a "politicization" of the TC, which necessarily exists, but a despicable politiquerización. "
The truth is that this situation does nothing but prolong the mediocrity and corruption worse, makes you lose hope TC see a really competent and responsible.
0 comments:
Post a Comment