Those who follow the news will be aware of the new measures that the national government will take to withstand the global crisis.
Among them is the possibility of facilitating the repatriation of money placed on the outside.
At first glance, seems a sensible idea. But what are the implications beyond what was officially proposed?
What would a law like this is nothing more nor less than allowing many companies free from judicial office on issues of monetary transactions .
The most famous case, perhaps, is to Skanska. After this law by paying some money (unless he previously were required), would be free of charge.
And so many others, like Antonini Wilson
Some people say and reported, as Elisa Carrio, this has to do with a construction company Santa Cruz linked to Néstor Kirchner . We'll see what comes of it.
this will serve to boost or prevent the collapse of both, the economy may be true. But the fact remains that, apparently, one can make any baton in this country, and when a president or someone, at some point, will allow you to succeed.
There is a world of difference, I know, but I take leave to end a phrase intended to be illuminating in their comparability:
We had at one time political and judicial pardon, forgiveness, into the military.
now live in a time of pardons and pardons to economic forces.
